The Power of Co-Creation

by Venkat Ramaswamy & Francis Gouillart

Where have you seen co-creation among enterprises and employees?

by Blog Moderator, 08/06/10 11:58
Syndicate content

Join the Power of Co-Creation Community!

Sign up now to receive benefits & access to exclusive content.
You can still leave a comment as a guest.
Already a member? Log in now

Guest's picture
Newness test I like the stuff they wrote but soon I found myself confronted with the challenge to understand the newness of their thoughts. The challenge pushed me back into my library to do the “newness test” I did put all my books on my desk which are related to innovation. They counted by the 100s. All of them claimed to add knowledge to the innovation demain. Some did. I then made a tough but well (I do hope) educated decision. I picked nine of the key authors who added newness to the topic of innovation. My guess. They will be my benchmark to make the newness test for book. The first important thought was spelled out by Joe S. Bain in 1956. For him innovation was initiated outside of the market structure and thus outside the enterprise. A change in basic economic conditions and technological breakthroughs forces change on the market structure. Structure-conduct-performance was the mantra for the believers. Joseph A. Schumpeter challenged this point of view. As early as 1942 he suggested that changes of an industry landscape can come from within the system. He named as the main source of innovation a “creative entrepreneur”. How this would work, he let to our own imagination. Up until then academics had introduce the notion of exogenous and endogenous innovation. Peter Drucker shed some light into the black box of a “creative entrepreneur” (Discipline of Innovation). 1985 he suggested instead of trusting the myth of a “creative entrepreneur” to apply a systematic practice of innovation. It would purposefully search for innovation opportunites within and outside the enterprise. In the same year Michael E. Porter pushed the Bain view ahead. He claimed to have found the “structural determinants” which shape three generic strategies. Again: structure vs. entrepreneur. This school of thought shaped the agenda of managers quite significantly. It was all around the “conduct” or “competitive strategy” and with that the core competence concept of C.K. Prahalad and Gary Hamel (1990). With some distance one realizes that the fokus was pretty much on the supply side of the equation. Interestingly enough in 1986 two researchers pushed the endogenous growth back on the agenda. Paul M. Romer published “Origins of Endogenous Growth” and Eric van Hippel published his research on “The Sources of Innovation”. Romer separated theoreatically the recipe for innovation from the lone entrepreneur. Thus supporting what Drucker had suggested in the same year from a practical point of view. Van Hippel went down this route and introduced many sources of innovation one of which is the enterprise. He introduced also the user as a source of innovation. In 1994 C.K. Prahalad and V. Ramaswami generalised van Hippels concept and named it Co-Creation. They introduced two new thoughts First: Innovation is more about value than abaout a product or services. Second: Value is a joint creation of partners in the value chain. Value creator is not the enterprise. Value creation takes place when a buyer and user experience the features of a product or service. 1999 Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne built on the idea that value is the key to innovation. They pushed ahead two thoughts. Let us move from the focus on the supply side, which is in access anyway, to the demand side of the equation. Innovation should take place on the demand side. We should systematically explore value expectations of the non customers. Their format is well known under the brand “Blue Ocean Strategy” and has pulled a lot of pretty successful strategic moves till then. Back to the new book on Co Creation: The “heros” on which the ideas stand are Schumpeter, Drucker ,Romer and van Hippel. What is new though is a much more sofisticated view on how value is created. The introduction of an experience environment in which the value creation takes place pushed the value innovation concept ahead. They suggest rightly so that innovation has not only transient from the enterprise to the user but also from features to experience in which value is being created. Cut a long strory short. The book advances our thinking about innovation.
M.Deck's picture
Not sure if this is an example that's between the enterprise and its employees, but here's a business built entirely on the idea of customer co-creation. It's called quirky.com. What's interesting is the role of influencers in deciding what ideas get created and the fact that there are monetary incentives for participating. That would seem to encourage engagement. The whole idea of a business model based on co-creation is interesting -- a great example being CrushPad, a wine making operation where you plan, make, design, and bottle your own wine. The entire value chain is open to co-creation.
Francis Gouillart's picture
Yesterday, I had a conversation with the person who leads the Open Innovation program at a Fortune 50 company. How would you compare and contrast Open Innovation vs. Co-Creation?
Ed Prewitt's picture
This site's video on Cisco Systems shows how the company practices co-creation with its employees on a very large scale. Cisco uses an innovative organizational design and its own leading-edge networking technology to tap into the expertise of tens of thousands of employees. Its system of distributed leadership is unique, and 54,000 out of 66,000 employees were taking part in internal online discussion forums by the middle of last year.
Rob Shelton's picture
Orange, the operating brand of France Telecom, established broad co-creation innovation platforms with employees with a goal of supercharging innovation. The internal partnerships generated over 21,000 ideas in just one month in 2007 and grew to higher levels in 2008. More than 2,300 of these ideas have been implemented, generating over 400 million Euros of earnings and savings for the company.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Co-creation and open innovation

by Venkat Ramaswamy, 10/06/10 12:03
Syndicate content
Following Vijesh Unnikrishnan’s post, does a firm have to do more than just collaborate with external parties for its product innovation to be considered co-creative? The answer is “Yes” – we discuss this more fully in chapter 3 of The Power of Co-Creation on Innovation Co-Creation. Briefly, while popular approaches to opening up innovation, such as crowdsourcing and mass collaboration, aim to tap into talent outside the enterprise to widen the competence base of innovation and bring new perspectives into the innovation process, they often miss a key ingredient: the need to build a compelling engagement experience of collaborative innovation with participants. Crowdsourcing and mass collaboration do indeed involve the building of platforms to engage with external constituencies. Where they fall short, however, is in incorporating the participants’ experiences of interactions on these platforms, and their experiences of enterprise offerings and processes. We have repeatedly found this step to be a hurdle for companies engaging in open innovation, leading to partial or failed attempts. The solution lies in continuously generating insights from the engagement experiences of all participants, and then building the open innovation process with them in a mutually valuable manner. This requires dialogic, transparent, accessible, and reflexive interactions to make the process of open innovation more co-creative. Such innovation co-creation also addresses the challenge of opening up innovation in large, established organizations, by recognizing the experiences of people and talent inside the enterprise as much as those of outsiders. See illustrative examples in the book such as Wacoal (Japan) and Orange Telecom (France).

Join the Power of Co-Creation Community!

Sign up now to receive benefits & access to exclusive content.
You can still leave a comment as a guest.
Already a member? Log in now

Guest's picture
http://vubobipu.site90.net
Muhammad Saeed's picture
Sir, i have asked a question earlier but unfortunately nobody commented on that. its ok i have another query as i am working these day on two papers. I. The Antecedents of Co-Creation and 2. Customer Satisfaction via co-creation; a novel approach. can you help me out by advising some details and recommending some helpful materials. Thanks
Muhammad Saeed's picture
Sir, i have asked a question earlier but unfortunately nobody commented on that. its ok i have another query as i am working these day on two papers. I. The Antecedents of Co-Creation and 2. Customer Satisfaction via co-creation; a novel approach. can you help me out by advising some details and recommending some helpful materials. Thanks
Muhammad Saeed's picture
I am a Phd Scholar at Iqra University Islamabad, Pakistan. I am also working on Co-Creation and i have found the process one of the novel approaches to the innovation. i would like to share a company's strategy working in Pakistan since 2008 and i would like to ask you senior people whether it is co-creation or not? what can be the antecedents of Co-creation of services? i have a lot of questions in my mind but due to very limited membership with this site, i would be able to write only the above mentioned. ZONG (A china Mobile Company) is working in Pakistan since 2008 and they have launched a package called M9. The best thing this package has is that you have to log on the internet to set the package for you. the company has mass customized some of the items for the ease of its customers but still the consumer has to do a lot more with his desired package. the package is getting famouse and they have captured ver good amount of their customers through advertising campaigns. I would like to ask you people whether we call it a co-creation process or not? Please reply as soon as possible Very Best Regards msaeed20m@yahoo.com 00923215553554
Muhammad Saeed's picture
I am a Phd Scholar at Iqra University Islamabad, Pakistan. I am also working on Co-Creation and i have found the process one of the novel approaches to the innovation. i would like to share a company's strategy working in Pakistan since 2008 and i would like to ask you senior people whether it is co-creation or not? what can be the antecedents of Co-creation of services? i have a lot of questions in my mind but due to very limited membership with this site, i would be able to write only the above mentioned. ZONG (A china Mobile Company) is working in Pakistan since 2008 and they have launched a package called M9. The best thing this package has is that you have to log on the internet to set the package for you. the company has mass customized some of the items for the ease of its customers but still the consumer has to do a lot more with his desired package. the package is getting famouse and they have captured ver good amount of their customers through advertising campaigns. I would like to ask you people whether we call it a co-creation process or not? Please reply as soon as possible Very Best Regards msaeed20m@yahoo.com 00923215553554
Guest's picture
No question this is the place to get this info, tahnks y'all.
Guest's picture
what is celexa http://biz96.inmotionhosting.com/~affili19/imagess/zithromax/buy_zithromax_online.jpg buy celexa online - celexa panic disorder weight loss celexa buy celexa online - night sweats celexa
Guest's picture
tehnik berburu dollar terbaik dan tercantik di http://goldenwap.net
Guest's picture
Is there any evidence of emerging co-creation in service industries such as Insurance? If so, what sort of assets are being co-created?
Guest's picture
A nice example of Dell Idea Storm, a often used case for co-creation. 1 month ago I came across a post on Dell Idea Storm of a consumer that argues that Dell is not visibly interacting with consumers on the Idea Storm. Already 410 participants have promoted this post. This shows that you can have a good idea to interact with your community, but should create a long lasting relation with you community else they will go to the competitor. This link shows the post: http://www.ideastorm.com/ideaView?id=087700000000jhaAAA

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

Co-creating campaigns and the social contract

by Francis Gouillart, 09/30/10 21:28
Syndicate content
In discussing co-creation among enterprises and public, private, and social entities, Keith Katz asks whether there are examples of co-creation within politics. The answer is yes: a major factor in Barack Obama’s election, for example, was his campaign’s unprecedented use of social media to allow enthusiasts to participate. One columnist wrote, “Most campaigns try desperately to keep control of the candidate's image and message and discourage supporters from improvising on the official party line. Team Obama did the opposite, encouraging campaign creativity with few restrictions,” adding that “In effect, Obama allowed any supporter to be a self-directed campaign manager” (Errol Louis). The campaign website MyBarackObama.org morphed after the election into Change.gov, a website used by the Office of the President-Elect to co-create an initial agenda once the Obama administration took office. Since then, Republicans have taken a page from the Democrats’ playbook and perhaps even surpassed them in the use of social media. Sites such as GOP.org give each party member a personal homepage, supercharge participation, and provide thinking points. And then there’s the Tea Party, which is arguably an exercise in co-creation. Outside the U.S., the governments of Hong Kong, Seoul, South Korea, and Andhra Pradesh, India, have showed how the social contract can be built piece-by-piece by citizens at the local level, rather than mandated from the top. Undoubtedly there are other examples. What cases can you, our readers, share?

Join the Power of Co-Creation Community!

Sign up now to receive benefits & access to exclusive content.
You can still leave a comment as a guest.
Already a member? Log in now

Guest's picture
Social media has been a deciding factor in recent elections, and its importance will only grow in the coming years, as TV loses its edge over the internet and other types of medias. création site web
Guest's picture
Social media had a huge impact and it will continue to even as a small charlotte electrician company small businesses will need to engage in these practices to keep up. The times, they are a changin!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

Co-creation across the B2B2B...2C activity chain

by Venkat Ramaswamy, 08/06/10 12:03
Syndicate content
Following Albert Sun’s postings on co-creation with suppliers, this is indeed a vast, untapped opportunity space. As he points out, in situations where an enterprise has a widely dispersed supplier base and the products are complex, there are benefits to extensive sharing of knowledge and experiences. But this is also true of commodity businesses. A good example is ITC e-Choupal, which deals with widely dispersed farmers in India to procure soybean, grain, and other commodities, which it processes further and sells as inputs to, for example, food related businesses. By engaging with farmers in a dialogue about their agricultural practices and enabling them to interact with other farmers as a community and connecting them with a network of agribusiness input providers (fertilizers, pesticides, etc.) and services (e.g., micro-insurance of crops), they have enabled a “supplier ecosystem”.

Further, co-creation can push the envelope even when suppliers are less dispersed and more concentrated, or for that matter even with a single supplier. Consider the logistics business, a complex business involving sophisticated information systems. (Thanks to Shomit Manapure, co-creator of this example.) Ryder is one of many third-party logistics (3PL) companies that rely heavily on Freightliner trucks for its fleet. Freightliner offers software packages that allow fleets to monitor their costs, and has become more involved in their 3PL customers’ quest for cost containment, customers who face cost pressures from fuel usage to maintenance to uneven driving performance. Ryder’s fleet size is over 150,000, and its annual consumption of diesel exceeds 400 million gallons. Freightliner is thus an important enabler for Ryder’s operational success. Managers of Ryder’s Fleet Management Services work closely with Freightliner’s design team, so that the trucks have the desired capabilities Ryder seeks. But Freightliner still lacks insight into the engagement experiences of Ryder’s customers down the chain. Freightliner’s design teams value more visibility into the interaction space across the downstream customer chain, so they can have better insights into end user product usage experiences.

The same is true between Freightliner and its suppliers such as engine manufacturers (e.g., Detroit Diesel). For instance, currently, Freightliner and engine manufacturers collaborate by sharing technology, making joint investments in research, and sharing information. This association primarily focuses on developing engines that comply with the emissions standards enforced by EPA, the specs desired by Freightliner, and the outcome of the engine research by the engine manufacturer. There is considerable potential for making this association more co-creative by elevating the interaction to the next level – i.e., enabling the experiences of the end-user of the trucks to be understood by the engine manufacturer. Since the engine development process is R&D-intensive, deviations can be very expensive. Yet the engine designers have to keep in mind not only their immediate customer such as Freightliner, but also the customers further down the value chain such as Ryder and drivers of the trucks. Many features such as idle time performance, fleet maintenance, carbon footprint, etc. could be incorporated more effectively in the design through insights gained from dialogue about people’s engagement experiences along the entire activity chain.

Freightliner is now working on enabling people inside the engine manufacturer organization and other suppliers as a community to provide repair or diagnosis methods directly to the service centers and the Freightliner call center. Going one step further, Freightliner has realized that its customers like Ryder may not know the best practices for usage and maintenance of Freightliner trucks, so one customer who may have “worst-in-class” uptime or fuel economy has little or no insight into what another customer may be doing to achieve best-in-class operational measures.

Co-creation has the potential to unlock the power of concurrent, collective interactions among multiple stakeholders in the system to generate additional value for each stakeholder, through the experiences of the people involved, over a continuous period of time. It can bring all parties together on the same platform to ease mutual goal alignment, enable richer and more meaningful dialogue, and achieve organization-specific outcomes, as well as joint outcomes. The challenges faced by each managerial function in the respective organizations across the activity system can be very diverse and difficult to understand at an industry or corporate level. The success of co-creation across organizations in the activity chain system relies heavily on enabling co-creative interactions among participants in the system and developing much more personal, participative, interactive relationships that generate new experiences of value to people all along the activity system.

Are there examples that people have seen of co-creation across a B2B2B…2C chain? If so, who drove it? Why? What were the challenges? Lessons learned?

Join the Power of Co-Creation Community!

Sign up now to receive benefits & access to exclusive content.
You can still leave a comment as a guest.
Already a member? Log in now

Guest's picture
I am Muhammad Saeed PhD Scholar at a local university in Pakistan. I will just share a company using something like co-creation and would like to ask you people...... is it really co-creation or something very near to that? The Company named ZONG (China Mobile company) working in Pakistan since late 2007 and they have launched a package called M9 Package. To use this package you have to log on to their website and chose the services according to your own useage. They have customized some of its components to facilitate the consumers. I want to quote an example of this company for my paper. Please oblige with your advise and i really need your help in this i have lots and lots of time to read and study all this. I have been reading about LEGO Factory, BMW and other co - creation realted literature and i will appreciate if you have something to share or to correct me or to help me out in this Very Best Regards msaeed20m@yahoo.com
marina21's picture
I think the size and cooperation among a company is critical to whether cocreation will emerge. Rigid power commands and hierarchy do not incite such dynamics. A midterm approach is also vital, most CEO's being short-sighted as far as immediate profits, neglecting the future of the company. Référencement
Guest's picture
I just read an interesting Fortune magazine article on "100 Best Companies to Work For" by Christopher Tkaczyk. Apparently American Express has been employing co-creation principles to improve customer service. The co-creative practice they took was to ask employees what changes they wanted to see. It has resulted in programs where a) the customers determine bonuses, b) flexible scheduling and other employee benefits. One of the primary changes in their customer service approach has been away from "efficiency" based directives such as keeping calls short, to more "relationship/experience development" focus where longer conversations with customers are encouraged. It was noted that it improved service margins by 10%. I can predict more continuing experimentation with Co-Creation as the company realizes benefits in customer and employee satisfaction
Guest's picture
the valuable advises u presented do help my research for my corporation, appreaciate that.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

The Power
of Co-Creation

Build it with them to boost growth, productivity, and profits

by Venkat Ramaswamy & Francis Gouillart